Don't be a Buerk, Michael
Aug. 17th, 2005 07:29 amhttp://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/08/16/dont_be_a_buerk_michael.html
A response to Michael "Life is now being lived in accordance with women's rules," Buerk:
By Ros Taylor / UK news 02:42pm
( Start here )
How about men's "reticence, stoicism and single-mindedness"? Curiously, the Adam Smith Institute recently suggested that it was just these qualities in women that made them less likely to obtain firsts at Oxford and Cambridge. "The boy sees the big picture, takes risks, and often misses important material," one (male) don explained. "The girl is systematic, does the detailed work, and sometimes misses the central thesis."
( More comment ) Put it this way: if this is life under the stiletto, then for God's sake kick us back into the kitchen. We're doing a poor job of running the world for our own benefit.'
A response to Michael "Life is now being lived in accordance with women's rules," Buerk:
By Ros Taylor / UK news 02:42pm
( Start here )
How about men's "reticence, stoicism and single-mindedness"? Curiously, the Adam Smith Institute recently suggested that it was just these qualities in women that made them less likely to obtain firsts at Oxford and Cambridge. "The boy sees the big picture, takes risks, and often misses important material," one (male) don explained. "The girl is systematic, does the detailed work, and sometimes misses the central thesis."
( More comment ) Put it this way: if this is life under the stiletto, then for God's sake kick us back into the kitchen. We're doing a poor job of running the world for our own benefit.'