Things which don't go without saying, but should

[purpletigron]

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8493&feedId=online-news_rss20

Pennsylvania science teachers will not be forced to advocate "intelligent design" after a judge ruled that that the theory is really religion in disguise. Judge John Jones of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania ruled that intelligent design - which bills itself as a scientific theory and states that life shows signs of being the work of an intelligent designer - is in fact reworked creationism.

The decision comes after 11 parents sued the Dover High School Board of Education for requiring that biology students be read a statement that cast doubt on evolution and endorsed intelligent design. Eight of the nine school board members were voted out of office in November, but the case continued in the court.

In his decision, Jones systematically dismantled the arguments of the proponents of intelligent design. Jones said that the history of intelligent design shows that it is essentially creationism with explicit references to God and the Bible removed. As such, it is primarily a religious theory, not a scientific one, and cannot be taught in US public schools, which are prevented from promoting religion.
Intentionally misleading

Jones also said that language in the school board statement that evolution is only a "theory" is misleading. It confuses the scientific and colloquial meanings of "theory". And by singling out evolution from all other scientific theories it suggests that there is some special doubt about the truth of evolution.

The judge stated that intelligent design cannot be considered science for a number of reasons. By depending on a supernatural cause it violates the basic ground rules of science that have been in place since the 16th century.

He also found that intelligent design relies on the "false dualism" that if evolution can be disproven, then intelligent design is proven. In any case, he found that intelligent design's criticisms of evolution have been largely refuted.

Comments

[mkillingworth.livejournal.com]

I am *so* glad to hear that! I used to live around the corner from a fundamentalist Southern Baptist university that taught biology using creationism. These people are just unbelievably dense!

[sammywol.livejournal.com]

Hooray! one more battle in a long war but it is still nice when they go the right way. I saw some wingnut TV evangelist threatening Dover with natural disasters as a sign of God's displeasure over the school board vote. Where's that divine retribution when you really need it huh?

[orangemike.livejournal.com]

From what I've read, it's a fine and righteous ruling. Hooray for the honorable judge, John E. Jones III!

[carandol.livejournal.com]

What a remarkably sensible judge.

[pigeonhed.livejournal.com]

If it's really intelligent design how come there are so many design faults? Can we get a refund if we return a faulty model (called George, for instance)?

[vgnwtch.livejournal.com]

Friends from Oklahoma are over. They've a friend who teaches chemistry at a university there; keeping her job entails never stepping on the toes of fundamentalist Christians, not saying anything that obviously endorses evolution, and not pointing out that Christians have a duty to the marginalised, the different, the poor, because the dominant brand of fundamentalist Christianity doesn't involve these virtues. Apparently, all the science students there are ostracised by the rest of the student body because, by definition, they must believe in evolution.