Food stuff
Jul. 16th, 2004 01:37 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My friend N, who has been suffering from grumbling 'IBS'-like symptoms for months, is being put on an 'exclusion diet' to try to find out whether there is a particular food which is causing the symptoms. Step one is to cut out all likely culprits for two weeks, and look for any improvements. If there are improvements, step two is to re-introduce foods one at a time, and look for symptoms returning.
The foods which N must cut out include: all dairy (not just cows), almost all cereals (all wheat products etc.), legumes (lentils, peanuts etc.), tea, citrus fruits.
The foods which N may eat are: unprocessed meats (including fish), vegetables (excluding potatoes), fruits (excluding citrus fruits), and rice.
It occurs to me that there is a reasonable correlation between 'foods which are potential problems' and 'food which were introduced in the Neolithic through agriculture'. Ever since I learned about celiac disease - which is a gradually fatal auto-immune reaction to protein fragments in wheat, rye, barley and maybe oats - I've been perplexed as to why a staple food could cause such a serious disease. But in evolutionary terms, we're only an eye-blink away from the Neolithic, so wheat still counts as a 'novel food' to our genome...
The foods which N must cut out include: all dairy (not just cows), almost all cereals (all wheat products etc.), legumes (lentils, peanuts etc.), tea, citrus fruits.
The foods which N may eat are: unprocessed meats (including fish), vegetables (excluding potatoes), fruits (excluding citrus fruits), and rice.
It occurs to me that there is a reasonable correlation between 'foods which are potential problems' and 'food which were introduced in the Neolithic through agriculture'. Ever since I learned about celiac disease - which is a gradually fatal auto-immune reaction to protein fragments in wheat, rye, barley and maybe oats - I've been perplexed as to why a staple food could cause such a serious disease. But in evolutionary terms, we're only an eye-blink away from the Neolithic, so wheat still counts as a 'novel food' to our genome...
no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 03:07 am (UTC)(I think I could live without cereals and dairy but not tea...)
You eat what you were...
Date: 2004-07-16 03:13 am (UTC)Another one of those intriguing factoids is that ~75% of adults worldwide are unable to digest lactose, but only ~20% of European adults suffer that problem - and they are distant descendents of early cattle herders.
Re: You eat what you were...
Date: 2004-07-16 03:43 am (UTC)Maybe one of our greatest difficulties is determining how many degrees of separation we each have from ancestral derivations. I wonder if the 'cropping' up of ailments of the auto-immune varieties could give clues to Neolithic diet needs, and if returning to least tampered-with natural foods might help check the ongoing damages?
This train of thought leads me to genetically modified foods, increases in diabetes, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, ingestion of pig whipworm eggs to treat IBBS-type attacks, how too much cleanliness can backfire by leaving the young with too few antibodies, etc., etc., and so on! Dangerous for me to get 'thinking' at 4:30 a.m. ~ need to go back to bed....... Zzzzz
Re: You eat what you were...
Date: 2004-07-16 04:03 am (UTC)We can easily see that people vary in their natural 'external' physical make-up (super-models being a common example). It seems plausible that people should also vary in their 'internal' conditions - that each of us has a unique genetic inheritance, which could pre-dispose us toward individually specific dietary needs. I'm in the minority who can digest lactose, for example. However, almost everyone who makes nutritional recommendations seems to suggest that we all need to eat lots more vegetables 'as if our lives depended upon it': that would be a common nutritional inheritance.
It's extremely fascinating...
Re: You eat what you were...
Date: 2004-07-16 04:22 am (UTC)The human creature is endlessly fascinating ~ well, ALL of living creaturedom is worthy of intense study, if we can just manage to keep from extinctifying ourselves and the others before we understand the linkages!
Re: You eat what you were...
Date: 2004-07-16 04:38 am (UTC)I fully expect us to extinctify ourselves first...
no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 04:21 am (UTC)I'm confused on the wheat thing though, I know modern cultivated wheat is, er, modern, but didn't early man collect and use grain in its wild state to some extent?
On the same subject the so-called Paleolithic diet has been very helpful for a friend of mine with serious health problems, is about the only thing that's ever helped her.
Which vegetables, what meats?
Date: 2004-07-16 04:46 am (UTC)My understanding is that grass seeds must have been 'gathered' and eaten before they were 'domesticated'. Wild grass seed is too small and scattered to dominate any hunter-gatherer meal in the way that wheat dominates our diet, though.
Re: Which vegetables, what meats?
Date: 2004-07-16 04:57 am (UTC)Re: Which vegetables, what meats?
Date: 2004-07-16 05:18 am (UTC)Yes, I suppose its the change in quanitites that has an effect, though someone with celiac (spelling?) is sensitive to the smallest quantities. I wonder if any research has been done into whether the older kinds of grain have the same effect, in terms of gluten amounts etc.
Re: Which vegetables, what meats?
Date: 2004-07-16 05:55 am (UTC)Re: Which vegetables, what meats?
Date: 2004-07-17 02:13 am (UTC)It seems strange that you react to the undigestible carbohydrates in fruits and vegetables, but not the ones in (wheat?) bread? I thought it was all basically cellulose? How unpleasant for you :-(
Ostrich is extremely lean meat, so if it is the fattiness of grain-fed domestic meat that makes you unwell, it'd be a great alternative. Apparently, grass-fed farmed meat has a different, more nutritious kind of fat - it's still good to trim off the obvious fat, of course, but the stuff thats part of the muscle structure is apparently a good source of those useful omega-3 essential fatty acid molecules!
no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 05:17 am (UTC)Cant your friend get skin tests or blood tests done?
Love Bump
no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 02:07 am (UTC)N doesn't have food allergies, which are tested for by those things AFAIK: she's suspected of food intolerances, which are much more difficult to detect, I think.
I was tested for celiac disease because I have autoimmune thyroid disease: the two have a slight tendency to be inherited together. I presume that you've tested negative yourself - undiagnosed celiac is thought to end in digestive tract cancer :-(
no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-25 10:54 am (UTC)IBS
Date: 2004-07-28 06:59 am (UTC)Re: IBS
Date: 2004-07-28 07:40 am (UTC)Vegetarian celiacs must have a divil of a job. I have a friend who was very ill with celiac for a long time before diagnosis, and after a few years on the gluten free diet also had to give up cheese because it unmasked that intolerance!
My friend mostly suffers from night pains, and consequent extreme tiredness, as far as I know. If there isn't any sign of improvement soon, I think N will try going to an even blander diet for a little while, because I'm not sure that the nutritionist has much else to suggest :-(
I'm glad to hear that it can be possible to track down the main culprits eventually, anyhow! Stay well!