Expensive and dangerous
May. 17th, 2005 07:46 am
From the Home Office ID cards unit: "...we have never said that the Identity Cards Scheme is intended to be the sole solution to identity fraud, illegal immigration and working, or terrorism. The scheme is therefore not being designed to be the primary method of combating these problems." No2ID responds: "So what is the purpose of ID cards? If they are not the "primary method", then the £5.5bn would be better invested in a visible police presence, the security services and immigration officers to protect borders and locate illegal employers and their workers"
To learn more about the flaws in ID card systems, you can read a briefing [PDF] from Liberty (the UK civil liberties and human rights organisation), the No2ID FAQ, and a briefing [PDF] from Justice (an independent all-party law reform and human rights organisation of legal professionals, academic and volunteers). No2ID are also running a petition.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 07:30 am (UTC)Much better to invest the money in improving the PNC...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 08:59 am (UTC)Pin and CHip?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 09:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 04:46 pm (UTC)I think it's designed for all UK residents, but I can see why they might want to extend it to ex-pat nationals too.
Bleugh.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 06:32 pm (UTC)Interestingly, I don't have to register with the British Embassy here in Iceland. So even if the government had the embassies handle ID cards for ex-pats it would be very easy to slip through the net.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-17 07:54 pm (UTC)