![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Remember when Amazon delisted a tranche of books by openly non-str8 authors?
Now they've delisted an entire publisher:
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/01/29/macmillan-books-gone-missing-from-amazon/
Now they've delisted an entire publisher:
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/01/29/macmillan-books-gone-missing-from-amazon/
Soft bigotry of low expectations
Date: 2010-01-30 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-30 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-30 08:28 pm (UTC)Broadly speaking:
Amazon wants ebook prices to be as low as possible, since their product is the Kindle, and cheaper books will encourage people to by their reader with competition on the way (Nook, iPad).
Publishers want to charge as much as they think the market will bear, as thatʻs where they think they will make their profit.
And the Reader? Well theirʻs is a sustainability issue here. Most reading commentators say they want the ebook version to be as cheap as possible (the even $10 is too high argument). But in a long term view, readers want books to be as cheap as possible but still reward the authors enough to keep writing.
Writers without other day jobs (of which my mother is one) are in a similar position to readers, but with less power (a reader can wait for cheaper editions, there is normally a limited range of potential publishers).
In this particular case, Amazon, at the peak of its ebook power is trying to set the playing field for the next few years.
Just like music sales, it is going to take some time for the existing distribution networks to finally settle on a ʻcheap without DRMʻ ultimate balancing.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-30 08:42 pm (UTC)Until things settle down I'm keeping with the library service, and the poor author just gets 6p.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-30 08:53 pm (UTC)